Boat Registration Fee Increase Update

RBOC is pleased to report that the efforts of thousands of individual boaters, the boating community and industry, and our national advocacy partner BoatUS have saved California boaters from paying $60 more in state boat registration fees that would have begun July 1 of this year.

The legislation establishing California’s 2023-2024 fiscal year budget did not resolve the ongoing $20 million annual deficiency in the Division of Boating and Waterways’ Harbors and Watercraft Revolving Fund. The issue has not been finally resolved and the issue will be revisited in 2024 when the Legislature convenes the second year of the 2023-2024 legislative session.

What our National Advocacy Partner BoatU.S. has to say about us....

California ranks 4th when it comes to registered boats among our 50 states. Luckily Golden State boaters have a strong voice thanks to their regional advocacy group, a BoatU.S. partner.

Read the article The Recreational Boaters of California: Advocates since 1968” in the June edition of BoatUS Magazine: click here

The San Diego skyline on San Diego Bay. California is a perennial Top 5 state for pleasure boats with 645,951 registered in 2020. 

250% Boat Registration Fee Hike - Prevented for Now

RBOC appreciates the action taken by Governor Newsom and the State Legislature to remove a proposed 250% increase in boat registration fees from the state budget in response to the serious concerns raised by RBOC, our national advocacy partner BoatU.S., and boating associations including the Pacific Inter-Club Yacht Association, Southern California Yachting Association, Marine Recreation Association, California Association of Harbor Masters and Port Captains, California Yacht Brokers Association, National Marine Manufacturers Association, California Association of Harbor Masters and Port Captains, thousands of California boaters who took action, and several other allied organizations.

"This is the right decision for boaters," responded RBOC President Winston Bumpus. "The further we look into the many different pots where boater-generated fuel tax dollars are placed, the more questions boaters have identified about the fairness of a registration fee increase."

Continued Bumpus: "For instance, boaters pay $107 million each year in fuel taxes to the state, yet only $15 million [14%] is provided to the Harbors and Watercraft Revolving Fund [HWRF] for a number of programs and services including boater education and operator certification, safety and enforcement on the waterways, boating facilities, removal of abandoned and derelict watercraft, and efforts to combat invasive species."

Added David B. Kennedy with BoatU.S. Government Affairs: "This is a great demonstration of the benefits of boaters engaging on issues that matter to their boating. Working with RBOC, over 4,000 messages were sent by BoatU.S. members to the legislature and governor. It's clear their voices were heard."

The final state budget action allocates state general fund dollars to the Harbors and Watercraft Revolving Fund [HWRF] administered by the Division of Boating and Waterways [DBW] for a variety of programs and services that benefit boaters.

RBOC and others will participate in a public stakeholder process DBW will initiate in the near future to develop recommendations to the Legislature for long-term solutions to the deficiencies that DBW and State Parks state that the HWRF is experiencing. Boat registration fees will be part of that conversation, together with efficiencies and improvements to existing programs and revisions to better serve the boating public.

RBOC Urges Inclusion of Boating and Fishing Protections in AB 3030

RBOC testified in the State Capitol again today, this time in the Senate Appropriations Committee, urging that AB 3030 [Kalra] be amended to include critical protections for boating and fishing opportunities in the measure.

RBOC is participating in a unified effort together with our national partner BoatU.S., boating industry associations, and fishing and hunting organizations.

Our communities are urging amendments to AB 3030 to specifically acknowledge the extent and impacts of existing protections of the state’s waters.

Following extensive public testimony, the committee placed AB 3030 “on suspense” due to the projected state costs. The committee plans to announce tomorrow which bills on the suspense list pass through committee and on to the Senate Floor for consideration prior to an August 31 deadline.

RBOC will issue a new call-to-action if the bill passes committee without the essential amendments.

AB 3030 would establish new land, water, and ocean protection goals, including the protection of 30 percent of the state’s land areas and water by 2030.

RBOC & BoatU.S. Urge State to Consider Sound Science Before Adopting Non-point Source Plan

RBOC and BoatU.S. are urging the State Water Resources Control Board to utilize sound science and site-specific testing as the critical path forward, and to resolve key boater concerns, prior to adoption of a proposed Nonpoint Source Program Implementation Plan.

Boating and the boating industry represent a significant recreational resource and an important part of California’s economy. Together, we have been engaged continually over many years to protect the environment as the state and regional boards have addressed impaired water bodies, have developed basin plans, and have developed new standards including anti-fouling paints for boat hulls.

RBOC and BoatU.S. are emphasizing several key points in our request to the State Water Board:

  • As stated in our July 10 comments, it is essential that stakeholders be engaged in the consideration of comprehensive plans such as this proposal, especially when they will have significant impacts. To the best of our knowledge, this has not occurred with the current proposal.

  • It is critical to boaters that any decisions that restrict or prohibit the use of anti-fouling paints containing copper be predicated on clear findings that alternatives are available, effective and affordable. However, at this time, no single alternative will work, boat paint formulations are constantly changing, and non-biocidal paint safety has not been confirmed.

  • Current TMDL models are ineffective as management tools yet adaptations to those models are practically impossible to achieve. Updated science is overlooked.

  • The recreational boating community and industry are challenged by the absence of coordination among the regulatory entities including the State Water Board, regional water boards, and the Department of Pesticide Regulation. This impacts numerous issues ranging from the available paints, the models for managing water quality, the appropriate monitoring schemes, and the interconnection among toxicity labs.

  • Background levels of copper confound the ability to achieve numerical standards. High background levels of dissolved copper in hydraulically connected waters make achieving the numerical limit impossible.

  • The Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board should not issue an investigative order and should not develop conditional WDRs for the discharge of biocides from boats residing in marinas until the boating community has a feasible, reasonable and readily-available alternative non-biocidal anti-fouling paints. RBOC and BoatU.S. remain committed to the protection and enhancement of the state’s waterways.

These and other public comments have been prepared and submitted to the State Water Board by a number of stakeholders representing the recreational boating community including boaters, clubs and industry.

RBOC is endorsing and urging consideration of the comments, concerns and requests set forth in the public comments of the Marine Recreation Association comment letter dated July 29, the Moffatt and Nichol Memorandum “Review of Non-copper-based Alternative Antifouling Paints to Support Discussion on Implementation Strategies for Reducing Copper by Boat-Paint Conversions” dated July 29, and the ChemMetrics comment letter dated July 29.