Save Delta Boating - Take Action by December 16

RBOC is requesting that boaters take action by December 16 in opposition to the latest draft Delta Conveyance that would negatively impact the ability of the recreational boating public to navigate in the waterways of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

To take action by email, mail, verbally or online: click here

Let us know that you have taken action by emailing us: rboc@rboc.org.

RBOC opposes this Delta Conveyance Project in comments submitted to the California Department of Water Resources. For a copy of the letter: click here.

More on our position:

RBOC opposes the Delta Conveyance Project that would negatively impact the ability of the recreational boating public to navigate in the waterways of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

 RBOC has commented previously and consistently as the state has considered the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, the California Water Fix and now the single Delta Conveyance Project.

This project has several fatal flaws. Specific to recreation, the project would severely disrupt navigation, boating-related commerce and communities throughout the lengthy, fourteen years of construction. It is a false assumption that recreational activity would merely move to other areas.

There is a potential for the project to significantly increase the transport of invasive species into the Delta waterways, and to exacerbate the occurrence of harmful algal blooms. These reduce recreational opportunities on the waterways and already impose significant costs on the boating community.

These boating impacts would be long-term and even permanent. However, the project fails to adequately identify and fully mitigate these impacts with certainty.

While the project might enhance the availability of fresh water for transport out of the Delta, the $14 billion expenditure would hasten the demise of aquatic conditions in the Delta as climate change occurs. The foreseeable impacts include higher air temperatures, varying seasonality of inflows, fluctuations in wet weather periods as well as droughts, decreased snow melt, increased risk of wildfires, saltwater intrusion further into the Delta, higher sea levels, and decreased water quality especially during droughts.

However, the draft environmental impact analysis inadequately analyses these future risks. It unrealistically limits the future conditions only to the year 2040 for the evaluation of the climate as well as social impacts. It also fails to either disclose or evaluate numerous uncertainties, unknowns, and assumptions associated with the project.

To the contrary, the laws, policies and projects that are already in place including water conservation, recycling, ground water recovery, desalination plants, surface water storage, ground water management, support a No Project Alternative.

RBOC remains concerned that this project creates no new sources of water to address the impacts of the drought, climate change, and population growth. The primary emphasis is to move high quality water from the Delta, which would leave poor quality water for the inhabitant fish species, wildlife and humans. The project does not restore and protect the Delta and its ecosystems. The mitigations are weak to non-existent and in many instances, impacts are mis-characterized as ‘LTS’ [less than significant] to ‘NI’ [No Impact].

In summary, the key concerns are:

  1. Disruption to navigable waters in the Delta for 14 years during construction

  2. Does not adequately address climate change and its impacts on decreased snow melt

  3. Unquantified Groundwater Impacts (for Example Table 8.0) non meaningful LTS – Less Than Significant

  4. Does not create any new sources of water

  5. Will wreak havoc on the aquatic species, wildlife, inhabitants, recreational users and supporting industries

For more information on the Delta Conveyance and the Draft EIR: click here

RBOC Renews Call-to-Action: Oppose Elimination of Judicial Review of Twin Tunnels

RBOC on July 10 is renewing our May 18 call-to-action urging California Boaters to contact their representatives in the US Senate and US House of Representatives as soon as possible, urging them to vote against a new “rider” that would prevent judicial review of the RBOC-opposed California. WaterFix [twin tunnels].

RBOC is concerned that the proposed prohibition against federal and state judicial review of the environmental provisions of the California WaterFix would be contrary to important, long-standing state environmental laws and policies. The California WaterFix should not have a special exception to these laws.

To email Senator Feinstein: click here [Please note the Senator's opposition discussed below]

To email Senator Harris: click here

To find and contact your representative in the US House of Representatives: click here

Senator Feinstein's Opposition Position

RBOC acknowledges and appreciates the opposition position to the rider that Senator Feinstein has stated in her June 22 response to RBOC President John Marshall:

Dear John: 

Thank you for contacting me regarding a proposal to waive all federal and state environmental laws and judicial review for a water project planned for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, which is one of the largest estuaries in western North America.  I recognize that the Delta is both an incredibly rich, sensitive ecosystem and important water source for many California communities.  I appreciate hearing from you, and I welcome the opportunity to respond.

Please know that I share your strong opposition to a provision in House appropriations legislation that would waive all federal and state laws and judicial review for the proposed California “WaterFix” project.  The WaterFix is a complex proposal that is estimated to cost $17 billion.  I do not have a position on the project itself, but I strongly believe that it should be subject to the full scrutiny of federal and state environmental laws and the independent judiciary.

As you may know, the WaterFix project would authorize the building of twin tunnels to move water from the Sacramento River to the State Water Project and Central Valley Project’s pumping plants, commonly referred to as the Jones and Banks pumping stations.  From there, the water would then travel through the California Aqueduct, Delta Mendota Canal, and other facilities to be pumped to central and southern California.  For more information on the proposed project, you may wish to visit: www.californiawaterfix.com

I appreciate learning of your opposition to this appropriations rider, and I will continue to monitor the status of the WaterFix proposal.  As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I will keep your comments in mind as the federal funding process moves forward

Once again, thank you for writing.  Should you have any other questions or comments, please call my Washington, D.C., office at (202) 224-3841 or visit my website at feinstein.senate.gov.  You can also follow me online at YouTubeFacebook, and Twitter, and you can sign up for my email newsletter at feinstein.senate.gov/newsletter.

Best regards.

Sincerely yours,

Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator

More Information on the Rider

The rider has been introduced by California representative Ken Calvert [R-Corona]. It is Section 437 of the US House of Representatives Fiscal Year 2019 Interior Appropriations Spending Bill. It reads:

SEC. 437. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Final Environmental Impact Report/Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan/California Water Fix [81 Fed. Reg. 96485 (Dec. 30, 2016)] and any resulting agency decision, record of decision, or similar determination shall hereafter not be subject to judicial review under any Federal or State law.

The passage and enactment of this provision would pre-empt state law and prevent litigation including cases filed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the California Endangered Species Act, and other laws.

RBOC is concerned that the proposed prohibition against federal and state judicial review of the environmental provisions of the California WaterFix [twin tunnels] would be contrary to important, long-standing state environmental laws and policies. The California WaterFix [twin tunnels] should not have a special exception to these laws.